All exam insights

0607 · June 2024

International Mathematics

Candidates should pay attention to how a question is phrased, for example Question 9 requires the answer in its simplest form and Question 21 asks for a time in minutes not hours. Workings are vital in questions with more than one mark, particularly those with no scaffolding such as Questions 9, 16 and 21.

16 pitfalls126 questions8 takeawaysView official report
Last reviewed: 2026-06-30Paraphrased for study purposes — not an official publication of the exam board.

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

No data available in official reports

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

need to have completed the full Core syllabus

2

must be able to apply formulae and clearly show all necessary workings

3

are reminded of the need to read the questions carefully, focussing on key words and instructions

4

should check their answers for sense and accuracy.

5

Calculators are not permitted on this paper, so candidates need to be able to perform calculations using a range of non-calculator methods.

6

It is important that candidates work accurately, avoiding arithmetical errors; they should also show their working clearly.

7

Candidates need to be able to deal with place values when multiplying pairs of decimals (Question 5).

8

They should calculate with fractions where appropriate; using non-exact decimals introduces errors and leads to a loss of marks.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

0607/11

Paper 1 (Core)

Weakest: Q18, Q20, Q22
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q3(a)
Q3(b)
Q4(a)
Q4(a)(b)
Q5
Q6
Q6(a)
Q6(b)
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
Q11
Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
Q18
Q19
Q20
Q21
Q22
Q23
StrongMixedWeak

0607/12

Paper 1 (Core)

Weakest: Q15
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q4(a)
Q4(b)
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
Q11
Q11(a)
Q11(b)
Q12
Q12(a)
Q12(b)
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
Q18
Q19
Q20
Q21
Q22
Q23
StrongMixedWeak

0607/13

Paper 1 (Core)

Weakest: Q6, Q16
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q8(a)
Q8(b)
Q9
Q10
Q11
Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
Q18
Q19
Q20
Q21
StrongMixedWeak

0607/21

Paper 2 (Extended)

Weakest: Q8(a)(b), Q12
Q1
Q2(a)
Q2(a)(b)
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8(a)
Q8(a)(b)
Q9
Q10(a)
Q10(a)(b)
Q11(a)
Q11(a)(b)
Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
StrongMixedWeak

0607/22

Paper 2 (Extended)

Q1
Q2(a)
Q2(a)(b)
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7(a)
Q7(a)(b)
Q8
Q9
Q10(a)
Q10(a)(b)
Q10(a)(c)
Q11
Q12
Q12(a)
Q12(b)
Q13
Q13(a)
Q13(b)
Q13(c)
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
StrongMixedWeak

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

0607/13 · Q17

Method marks · 0607/13 · Q17

Some started with 12 ÷ 45 but then did not go on to multiply this by 60; this statement was awarded with a method mark.

0607/22 · Q7(a)(b)

Method marks · 0607/22 · Q7(a)(b)

Nearly all candidates scored the method mark, but there were careless mistakes when candidates tried to simplify a correct answer.

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

No data available in official reports

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

No data available in official reports

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

No data available in official reports

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

No data available in official reports

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2023
2024
2025
Σ

Sequences

30
28
58

Algebraic manipulation

12
14
14
40

Functions

14
11
25

Similarity

15
15

Surface area and volume

14
14

Pythagoras’ theorem

13
13

Probability of combined events

12
12

Transformations

11
11

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

202320242025
2023 June 2023 · 3.4/52024 June 2024 · 3.5/52025 June 2025 · 3.0/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

No data available in official reports

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    need to have completed the full Core syllabus

  • 2Message

    must be able to apply formulae and clearly show all necessary workings

  • 3Message

    are reminded of the need to read the questions carefully, focussing on key words and instructions

  • 4Message

    should check their answers for sense and accuracy.

  • 5Message

    Calculators are not permitted on this paper, so candidates need to be able to perform calculations using a range of non-calculator methods.

  • 6Message

    It is important that candidates work accurately, avoiding arithmetical errors; they should also show their working clearly.

  • 7Message

    Candidates need to be able to deal with place values when multiplying pairs of decimals (Question 5).

  • 8Message

    They should calculate with fractions where appropriate; using non-exact decimals introduces errors and leads to a loss of marks.

  • 9Method

    Some started with 12 ÷ 45 but then did not go on to multiply this by 60; this statement was awarded with a method mark.

  • 10Method

    Nearly all candidates scored the method mark, but there were careless mistakes when candidates tried to simplify a correct answer.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

June 2024 2024

International Mathematics

Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education 0607 Cambridge International Mathematics June 2024 Principal Examiner Report for Teachers © 2024 CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS Paper 0607/11 Paper 1 (Core) Key messages To succeed with this paper, candidates

  • need to have completed the full Core syllabus

  • must be able to apply formulae and clearly show all necessary workings

  • are reminded of the need to read the questions carefully, focussing on key words and instructions

Examiner insights

General comments

  • Candidates should pay attention to how a question is phrased, for example Question 9 requires the answer in its simplest form and Question 21 asks for a time in minutes not hours.
  • Workings are vital in questions with more than one mark, particularly those with no scaffolding such as Questions 9, 16 and 21.
  • This is particularly important with problem-solving questions – Questions 11, 15 and 23.
  • Candidates must make sure that they do not make numerical errors especially in questions that are only worth one mark when any good working will not get the mark if the answer is inaccurate.
  • The questions that presented least difficulty were Questions 2, 3(a), 5, 6(b) and 8.