7408 · AQA A Level
7408/11
Paper 1
Physics · June 2024 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: AQA
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.5 / 5
215
310 min
Practical skills and limitation of physical measurements
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
215
Duration
310 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The June 2024 AQA A-Level Physics series maintained a robust standard of assessment, heavily testing practical competence (RPA 5 and 10), mathematical manipulation, and field theory.
While Paper 1 delivered standard mechanics and wave scenarios, Paper 2 presented demanding potential landscape and electromagnetic induction analysis.
Paper 3 Section A demanded exceptional precision in graphical calculations and absolute/percentage uncertainty comparison.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Mathematical
Weight: 6100%Practical
Weight: 583%Conceptual Explanation
Weight: 467%Graphical Construction
Weight: 233%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level A*
Approx. 68% of maximum mark
Level A
Approx. 55% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 46% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 36% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 27% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 18% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Determine” questions.
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
Present multiple perspectives with evidence; balance breadth and depth.
Match the expected response style for “Show” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Deduce” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.6
Min per mark: 1.4
Min per mark: 1.4
Min per mark: 1.4
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Limitation of physical measurements
45 marks this session
Radioactivity
27 marks this session
Force, energy and momentum
20 marks this session
Electric fields
17 marks this session
Particles
16 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Limitation of physical measurements
Radioactivity
Force, energy and momentum
Thermal physics
Electric fields
Particles
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1:
Paper 2:
Paper 3 (Section A):
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Limitation of physical measurements
45 marks this session
Practise in RevuiRadioactivity
27 marks this session
Practise in RevuiForce, energy and momentum
20 marks this session
Practise in RevuiElectric fields
17 marks this session
Practise in RevuiParticles
16 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The June 2024 AQA A-Level Physics series maintained a robust standard of assessment, heavily testing practical competence (RPA 5 and 10), mathematical manipulation, and field theory.
- 2Message
While Paper 1 delivered standard mechanics and wave scenarios, Paper 2 presented demanding potential landscape and electromagnetic induction analysis.
- 3Message
Paper 3 Section A demanded exceptional precision in graphical calculations and absolute/percentage uncertainty comparison.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
June 2024 2024
Physics
The June 2024 AQA A-Level Physics series maintained a robust standard of assessment, heavily testing practical competence (RPA 5 and 10), mathematical manipulation, and field theory. While Paper 1 delivered standard mechanics and wave scenarios, Paper 2 presented demanding potent
The June 2024 AQA A-Level Physics series maintained a robust standard of assessment, heavily testing practical competence (RPA 5 and 10), mathematical manipulation, and field theory.
While Paper 1 delivered standard mechanics and wave scenarios, Paper 2 presented demanding potential landscape and electromagnetic induction analysis.
Paper 3 Section A demanded exceptional precision in graphical calculations and absolute/percentage uncertainty comparison.
- Total marks
- 215
- Duration
- 310 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.5 / 5
Session analysis
The June 2024 AQA A-Level Physics series maintained a robust standard of assessment, heavily testing practical competence (RPA 5 and 10), mathematical manipulation, and field theory. While Paper 1 delivered standard mechanics and wave scenarios, Paper 2 presented demanding potential landscape and electromagnetic induction analysis. Paper 3 Section A demanded exceptional precision in graphical calculations and absolute/percentage uncertainty comparison.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1:
Paper 2:
Paper 3 (Section A):
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
79% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
structured
120·14·56%
multiple-choice
50·50·23%
practical-structured
45·3·21%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1 Section A (…
0.71 m/minPaper 1 Section B (…
0.71 m/minPaper 2 Section A (…
0.71 m/minPaper 2 Section B (…
0.64 m/minTotal marks
155
Total time
225 min
Avg pace
0.69
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Electromagnetic radiation and quantum phenomena
90%90%
Materials
85%85%
Wave-particle duality
80%80%
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.