Back to subject papers

0620 · Cambridge IGCSE

0620/61

Alternative to Practical

Chemistry · June 2025 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Demanding · 3.8/5

Analysis source: Cambridge Assessment International Education

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.8 / 5

Total marks

80

Duration

75 min

Most tested topic

Reversible reactions and equilibrium

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

80

Duration

75 min

Session difficulty

3.8 / 5

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

High-scoring candidates excelled on the standard descriptive sections, such as Atomic Structure and Isotopes in Question 2, and identifying Group VII properties in Question 6.

2

However, substantial marks were lost in the application of Le Chatelier's Principle to the methanol synthesis equilibrium (Question 5) and the correct determination of the mathematical sign in the bond energy enthalpy calculation (Question 6), where a final value of −7 kJ/mol-7\text{ kJ/mol}−7 kJ/mol required meticulous tracking of energy absorbed vs.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Knowledge witAO24
Handling Information3
InfoAO32
Experimental1

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

Knowledge witAO2Knowledge witAO2Handling InformationHandlingInformationInfoAO3InfoAO3ExperimentalExperimental
SkillWeightShare
  • Knowledge witAO2

    Weight: 4100%
  • Handling Information

    Weight: 375%
  • InfoAO3

    Weight: 250%
  • Experimental

    Weight: 125%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Report type

Cambridge Principal Examiner Report — component performance and international standards

Level A*

Approx. 86% of maximum mark

Level A

Approx. 72% of maximum mark

Level B

Approx. 58% of maximum mark

Level C

Approx. 44% of maximum mark

Level D

Approx. 38% of maximum mark

Level E

Approx. 33% of maximum mark

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

StateFrequency: 16

Match the expected response style for “State” questions.

ExplainFrequency: 6

Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.

DescribeFrequency: 5

State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.

CalculateFrequency: 5

Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.

DeduceFrequency: 3

Match the expected response style for “Deduce” questions.

DrawFrequency: 3

Match the expected response style for “Draw” questions.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

No data available in official reports

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Reversible reactions and equilibrium

11 marks this session

Preparation of salts

6 marks this session

Group VII properties

6 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2023
2025
Σ

Reversible reactions and equilibrium

11
11

Electrolysis

10
10

Atomic structure and the Periodic Table

9
9

Rate of reaction

8
8

Preparation of salts

6
6

Group VII properties

6
6

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

202320242025
2023 June 2023 · 3.8/52024 June 2024 · 2.8/52025 June 2025 · 3.8/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Paper 41 Theory (Extended):

80 marks75 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    High-scoring candidates excelled on the standard descriptive sections, such as Atomic Structure and Isotopes in Question 2, and identifying Group VII properties in Question 6.

  • 2Message

    However, substantial marks were lost in the application of Le Chatelier's Principle to the methanol synthesis equilibrium (Question 5) and the correct determination of the mathematical sign in the bond energy enthalpy calculation (Question 6), where a final value of −7 kJ/mol-7\text{ kJ/mol}−7 kJ/mol required meticulous tracking of energy absorbed vs.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

June 2025 2025

Chemistry

High-scoring candidates excelled on the standard descriptive sections, such as Atomic Structure and Isotopes in Question 2, and identifying Group VII properties in Question 6. However, substantial marks were lost in the application of Le Chatelier's Principle to the methanol synt

  • High-scoring candidates excelled on the standard descriptive sections, such as Atomic Structure and Isotopes in Question 2, and identifying Group VII properties in Question 6.

  • However, substantial marks were lost in the application of Le Chatelier's Principle to the methanol synthesis equilibrium (Question 5) and the correct determination of the mathematical sign in the bond energy enthalpy calculation (Question 6), where a final value of −7 kJ/mol-7\text{ kJ/mol}−7 kJ/mol required meticulous tracking of energy absorbed vs.

Total marks
80
Duration
75 min
Session difficulty
3.8 / 5

Session analysis

High-scoring candidates excelled on the standard descriptive sections, such as Atomic Structure and Isotopes in Question 2, and identifying Group VII properties in Question 6. However, substantial marks were lost in the application of Le Chatelier's Principle to the methanol synthesis equilibrium (Question 5) and the correct determination of the mathematical sign in the bond energy enthalpy calculation (Question 6), where a final value of −7 kJ/mol-7\text{ kJ/mol}−7 kJ/mol required meticulous tracking of energy absorbed vs. released.

Updated Jun 13, 2026

Paper breakdown

Paper 41 Theory (Extended):

80 marks75 min

Top chapters

Reversible reactions and equilibrium11 marks
Preparation of salts6 marks
Group VII properties6 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Reversible reactions and equili11 marks
Preparation of salts6 marks
Group VII properties6 marks
Formulae (Stoichiometry)5 marks
Formulae, functional groups and4 marks
Atomic structure and the Period4 marks
Metallic bonding4 marks
Isotopes4 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

83% within easy or medium reach

32
34
14
Easy: 32 marksMedium: 34 marksHard: 14 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

State16 times
Explain6 times
Describe5 times
Calculate5 times
Deduce3 times
Draw3 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

80Marks
  • Descriptive & Structured

    36·28·45%

  • Chemical Equations & Mechanism

    18·10·23%

  • Identification & Multiple-Choice Style

    16·10·20%

  • Calculations

    10·4·13%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Isotopes & Atomic …Group VII PropertiesPreparation of saltsReversible reactio…

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Electrolysis and Electrochemistry

95%

95%

Polymers (Condensation polyesters & polyamides)

90%

90%

Acid-Base Titrations and Volumetric Analysis

85%

85%

Examiner notes & key calculations

  • Metallic Bonding Descriptions: Many candidates failed to mention the electrostatic attraction between the positive metal cations and the sea of delocalised electrons, focusing only on the presence of mobile electrons.
  • Precipitation and Salt Prep: In describing the copper(II) sulfate crystallisation, candidates frequently forgot to specify heating to the point of crystallisation (saturated solution) rather than evaporating to dryness.
  • Oxidation States: Assigning the correct sign to oxidation numbers (e.g., −3-3−3 for nitrogen in ammonia) remains a persistent hurdle.

Exam tips

Paper format

Duration
1h
Total marks
40

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

0620/61 — Cambridge IGCSE Chemistry (June 2025) | Revui