9618 · Cambridge International A Level
9618/22
Fundamental Problem-solving and Programming Skills
Computer Science · June 2024 · Variant 2
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Cambridge Assessment International Education
3.8 / 5
300
450 min
Object-Oriented Programming, Binary Trees & Recursive Insertion Sorts
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
300
Duration
450 min
Session difficulty
3.8 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The Cambridge International AS & A Level Computer Science (9618) exam series for May/June 2024 maintains a high-quality standard, demanding rigorous practical execution alongside detailed theoretical foundations.
Across all four papers, we see a clear distribution of marks designed to separate grade boundaries, particularly focusing on string-trimming logic, custom binary tree traversals, and recursive implementation designs.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Algorithmic
Weight: 10100%Design
Weight: 990%Practical Programming
Weight: 880%Logical &
Weight: 660%Boolean
Weight: 550%Hardware &
Weight: 440%Networking Database
Weight: 330%Schema S
Weight: 110%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Cambridge Principal Examiner Report — component performance and international standards
Level A*
Approx. 74% of maximum mark
Level A
Approx. 64% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 53% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 43% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 33% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 24% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Match the expected response style for “Pseudocode” questions.
State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 2
Min per mark: 1.6
Min per mark: 1.2
Min per mark: 1.2
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Further Programming (A Level content)
97 marks this session
Programming (AS Level content)
38 marks this session
Algorithm Design and Problem-solving (AS Level content)
25 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Further Programming
Further Programming (A Level)
Further Programming (A Level content)
Algorithm Design and Problem-solving
Programming (AS Level)
Data Representation (A Level content)
Computational thinking and Problem-solving (A Level)
Programming (AS Level content)
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 12: Theory Fundamentals:
Paper 22: Problem-solving & Programming:
Paper 32: Advanced Theory:
Paper 42: Practical:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Further Programming (A Level content)
97 marks this session
Practise in RevuiProgramming (AS Level content)
38 marks this session
Practise in RevuiAlgorithm Design and Problem-solving (AS Level content)
25 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The Cambridge International AS & A Level Computer Science (9618) exam series for May/June 2024 maintains a high-quality standard, demanding rigorous practical execution alongside detailed theoretical foundations.
- 2Message
Across all four papers, we see a clear distribution of marks designed to separate grade boundaries, particularly focusing on string-trimming logic, custom binary tree traversals, and recursive implementation designs.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
June 2024 2024
Computer Science
The Cambridge International AS & A Level Computer Science (9618) exam series for May/June 2024 maintains a high-quality standard, demanding rigorous practical execution alongside detailed theoretical foundations. Across all four papers, we see a clear distribution of marks design
The Cambridge International AS & A Level Computer Science (9618) exam series for May/June 2024 maintains a high-quality standard, demanding rigorous practical execution alongside detailed theoretical foundations.
Across all four papers, we see a clear distribution of marks designed to separate grade boundaries, particularly focusing on string-trimming logic, custom binary tree traversals, and recursive implementation designs.
- Total marks
- 300
- Duration
- 450 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.8 / 5
Session analysis
The Cambridge International AS & A Level Computer Science (9618) exam series for May/June 2024 maintains a high-quality standard, demanding rigorous practical execution alongside detailed theoretical foundations. Across all four papers, we see a clear distribution of marks designed to separate grade boundaries, particularly focusing on string-trimming logic, custom binary tree traversals, and recursive implementation designs.
Updated Jun 12, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 12: Theory Fundamentals:
Paper 22: Problem-solving & Programming:
Paper 32: Advanced Theory:
Paper 42: Practical:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
75% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Practical Programming & Pseudocode Coding
145·12·48%
Structured Theory Explanations
72·18·24%
Short Answer & Conversions
45·15·15%
Databases & Prolog Rule Definitions
38·5·13%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Difficulty trend
Compare difficulty across recent years.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 12: Theory Fu
0.83 m/minPaper 22: Problem-s
0.63 m/minPaper 32: Advanced
0.83 m/minPaper 42: Practical
0.50 m/minTotal marks
300
Total time
450 min
Avg pace
0.67
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
SSL/TLS Protocol Handshakes & Digital Signatures
85%85%
Double Linked Lists or Circular Queues
80%80%
Assembly Language Instructions & Fetch-Execute Phase
75%75%
May/June 2024 Series Analysis
The Cambridge International AS & A Level Computer Science (9618) exam series for May/June 2024 maintains a high-quality standard, demanding rigorous practical execution alongside detailed theoretical foundations. Across all four papers, we see a clear distribution of marks designed to separate grade boundaries, particularly focusing on string-trimming logic, custom binary tree traversals, and recursive implementation designs.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 2h
- Total marks
- 75
- Weighting
- 25%
- Question types
- Tracing Logic and Dry Run Tables, Structure Charts and State Diagrams, Syllabus Pseudocode Writing
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.