9990 · Cambridge International A Level
9990/41
Specialist Options: Application
Psychology · June 2025 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Cambridge Assessment International Education
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.8 / 5
240
360 min
Organisational work conditions
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
240
Duration
360 min
Session difficulty
3.8 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The May/June 2025 Psychology (9990) papers presented a robust challenge, earning a solid 4-star difficulty rating.
Across all components, there was an intensified focus on precise methodological vocabulary, rigorous evaluation structures, and exact data-driven evidence.
Students who relied on vague, generic definitions or lacked structured study-specific data struggled to access the top mark bands.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Knowledge and Understanding
Weight: 3100%Application and S
Weight: 267%Analysis and
Weight: 133%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Cambridge Principal Examiner Report — component performance and international standards
Level A*
Approx. 63% of maximum mark
Level A
Approx. 56% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 49% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 43% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 36% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 29% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Outline” questions.
Apply knowledge to an unfamiliar context; concise, practical points score best.
Weigh arguments for and against with evidence; end with a supported judgement.
Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.8
Min per mark: 1.8
Min per mark: 1.7
Min per mark: 1.5
Min per mark: 1.4
Min per mark: 0.3
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Organisational work conditions
44 marks this session
Consumer decision-making
34 marks this session
Mood (affective) disorders: depressive disorder (unipolar) and bipolar disorder
32 marks this session
Pain
32 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Research Methods
Organisational work conditions
Consumer decision-making
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Clinical Psychology)
Mood (affective) disorders: depressive disorder (unipolar) and bipolar disorder
Pain
Andrade (doodling)
The physical environment (Consumer Psychology)
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 11: Approaches, Issues and Debates:
Paper 21: Research Methods:
Paper 31: Specialist Options:
Paper 41: Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Organisational work conditions
44 marks this session
Practise in RevuiConsumer decision-making
34 marks this session
Practise in RevuiMood (affective) disorders: depressive disorder (unipolar) and bipolar disorder
32 marks this session
Practise in RevuiPain
32 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The May/June 2025 Psychology (9990) papers presented a robust challenge, earning a solid 4-star difficulty rating.
- 2Message
Across all components, there was an intensified focus on precise methodological vocabulary, rigorous evaluation structures, and exact data-driven evidence.
- 3Message
Students who relied on vague, generic definitions or lacked structured study-specific data struggled to access the top mark bands.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
June 2025 2025
Psychology
The May/June 2025 Psychology (9990) papers presented a robust challenge, earning a solid 4-star difficulty rating. Across all components, there was an intensified focus on precise methodological vocabulary, rigorous evaluation structures, and exact data-driven evidence. Students
The May/June 2025 Psychology (9990) papers presented a robust challenge, earning a solid 4-star difficulty rating.
Across all components, there was an intensified focus on precise methodological vocabulary, rigorous evaluation structures, and exact data-driven evidence.
Students who relied on vague, generic definitions or lacked structured study-specific data struggled to access the top mark bands.
- Total marks
- 240
- Duration
- 360 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.8 / 5
Session analysis
The May/June 2025 Psychology (9990) papers presented a robust challenge, earning a solid 4-star difficulty rating. Across all components, there was an intensified focus on precise methodological vocabulary, rigorous evaluation structures, and exact data-driven evidence. Students who relied on vague, generic definitions or lacked structured study-specific data struggled to access the top mark bands.
Updated Jun 12, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 11: Approaches, Issues and Debates:
Paper 21: Research Methods:
Paper 31: Specialist Options:
Paper 41: Specialist Options: Application and Research Methods:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
73% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Short Answer
(Knowledge & Recall)
74·28·31%
Study Planning & Design
68·4·28%
Application & Scenario Analysis
52·18·22%
Evaluation & Essay
46·6·19%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 11: Section A
0.57 m/minPaper 11: Section B
0.73 m/minPaper 21: Section A
0.57 m/minPaper 21: Section B
0.67 m/minPaper 31: Option
2.89 m/minPaper 31: Option
4.72 m/minPaper 41: Section A
0.60 m/minTotal marks
500
Total time
305 min
Avg pace
1.64
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Schizophrenia
85%85%
Stress
80%80%
Milgram (obedience)
40%40%
May/June 2025 Exam Suite Analysis
The May/June 2025 Psychology (9990) papers presented a robust challenge, earning a solid 4-star difficulty rating. Across all components, there was an intensified focus on precise methodological vocabulary, rigorous evaluation structures, and exact data-driven evidence. Students who relied on vague, generic definitions or lacked structured study-specific data struggled to access the top mark bands.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h 30min
- Total marks
- 60
- Weighting
- 25%
- Question types
- Short Answer (Recall/Outline), Planning & Design (AO2)
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.