COMPUTER-SCIENCE · IB Diploma Programme
COMPUTER-SCIENCE/31
Paper 3
Computer Science · 2024 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: International Baccalaureate Organization
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.0 / 5
70
90 min
Computational thinking
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
70
Duration
90 min
Session difficulty
3.0 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The May 2024 IB Computer Science Standard Level (SL) Paper 1 represented a balanced assessment of core curriculum fundamentals.
Clocking in at 90 minutes for a total of 70 marks, the paper maintained its traditional split between the fast-paced theoretical recall of Section A and the algorithmic/problem-solving focus of Section B.
While some recall-heavy topics like OSI layers and binary conversions presented straightforward scoring opportunities, the algorithmic questions required high precision in logic and array handling.
Compare difficulty across recent years. Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Theoretical Comprehension
Weight: 8100%Algorithmic
Weight: 675%Design
Weight: 563%Logical
Weight: 450%Reasoning
Weight: 338%Technical
Weight: 225%Accurac
Weight: 113%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
IB subject report — grade distributions, IA weighting, and HL/SL distinctions
Level 7
Excellent — top band for competitive university offers
Level 6
Very good — strong HL performance
Level 5
Good — solid pass at higher level
Level 4
Satisfactory — minimum for many university credits
Level 3
Mediocre
Level 2
Poor
Level 1
Very poor
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.
Match the expected response style for “Outline” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Construct” questions.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Define” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.3
Min per mark: 1.3
Min per mark: 1.3
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Computational thinking
30 marks this session
Networks
17 marks this session
System fundamentals
14 marks this session
Computer organization
9 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Computational thinking
Networks
System fundamentals
Object-oriented programming (OOP)
Computer organization
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Standard Level
Paper 1:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Computational thinking
30 marks this session
Practise in RevuiNetworks
17 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSystem fundamentals
14 marks this session
Practise in RevuiComputer organization
9 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The May 2024 IB Computer Science Standard Level (SL) Paper 1 represented a balanced assessment of core curriculum fundamentals.
- 2Message
Clocking in at 90 minutes for a total of 70 marks, the paper maintained its traditional split between the fast-paced theoretical recall of Section A and the algorithmic/problem-solving focus of Section B.
- 3Message
While some recall-heavy topics like OSI layers and binary conversions presented straightforward scoring opportunities, the algorithmic questions required high precision in logic and array handling.
- 4Message
Compare difficulty across recent years. Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2024 2024
Computer Science
The May 2024 IB Computer Science Standard Level (SL) Paper 1 represented a balanced assessment of core curriculum fundamentals. Clocking in at 90 minutes for a total of 70 marks, the paper maintained its traditional split between the fast-paced theoretical recall of Section A and
The May 2024 IB Computer Science Standard Level (SL) Paper 1 represented a balanced assessment of core curriculum fundamentals.
Clocking in at 90 minutes for a total of 70 marks, the paper maintained its traditional split between the fast-paced theoretical recall of Section A and the algorithmic/problem-solving focus of Section B.
While some recall-heavy topics like OSI layers and binary conversions presented straightforward scoring opportunities, the algorithmic questions required high precision in logic and array handling.
- Total marks
- 70
- Duration
- 90 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.0 / 5
Session analysis
The May 2024 IB Computer Science Standard Level (SL) Paper 1 represented a balanced assessment of core curriculum fundamentals. Clocking in at 90 minutes for a total of 70 marks, the paper maintained its traditional split between the fast-paced theoretical recall of Section A and the algorithmic/problem-solving focus of Section B. While some recall-heavy topics like OSI layers and binary conversions presented straightforward scoring opportunities, the algorithmic questions required high precision in logic and array handling.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Standard Level
Paper 1:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
77% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Theoretical Explanation
28·8·40%
Short Answer & Theory Recall
21·10·30%
Pseudocode Algorithm Construction
15·3·21%
Logic Gate and Boolean Expression Evaluation
6·2·9%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Difficulty trend
Compare difficulty across recent years.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Section B - Q13 (Ne
0.75 m/minSection B - Q14 (Lo
0.75 m/minSection B - Q15 (Ar
0.75 m/minTotal marks
45
Total time
60 min
Avg pace
0.75
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
System Implementation / Changeover Methods
90%90%
Data Backup and Prevention of Data Loss
85%85%
Testing Strategies (Alpha/Beta)
80%80%
Examiner's Perspective: May 2024 SL Paper 1 Analysis
The May 2024 IB Computer Science Standard Level (SL) Paper 1 represented a balanced assessment of core curriculum fundamentals. Clocking in at 90 minutes for a total of 70 marks, the paper maintained its traditional split between the fast-paced theoretical recall of Section A and the algorithmic/problem-solving focus of Section B. While some recall-heavy topics like OSI layers and binary conversions presented straightforward scoring opportunities, the algorithmic questions required high precision in logic and array handling.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h
- Total marks
- 30
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.