SPORTS-EXERCISE-AND-HEALTH-SCIENCE · IB Diploma Programme
SPORTS-EXERCISE-AND-HEALTH-SCIENCE/11
(Core Multiple Choice)
Sports Exercise and Health Science · June 2023 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: International Baccalaureate Organization
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.4 / 5
120
180 min
Response
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
120
Duration
180 min
Session difficulty
3.4 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The May 2023 SL assessment presents a well-rounded challenge that tests both rote anatomical recall and complex data processing.
With a balanced mix of direct memory retrieval and multi-variable analytical tasks, students who relied purely on flashcards struggled on the high-mark application questions.
The difficulty index stands at a solid 3.4 out of 5, reflecting the rigorous application of command terms in Paper 2 and Paper 3.
Compare difficulty across recent years. Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Analysis & G
Weight: 6100%Anatomical
Weight: 583%Recall
Weight: 467%Physiological
Weight: 350%Psychological/
Weight: 233%Mathematical
Weight: 117%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
IB subject report — grade distributions, IA weighting, and HL/SL distinctions
Level 7
Excellent — top band for competitive university offers
Level 6
Very good — strong HL performance
Level 5
Good — solid pass at higher level
Level 4
Satisfactory — minimum for many university credits
Level 3
Mediocre
Level 2
Poor
Level 1
Very poor
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Match the expected response style for “Outline” questions.
State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.
Present multiple perspectives with evidence; balance breadth and depth.
Match the expected response style for “contrast” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Distinguish” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.5
Min per mark: 1.5
Min per mark: 1.5
Min per mark: 1.5
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Response
36 marks this session
Study Design and Research Methods
19 marks this session
Generating movement in the body
16 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Response
Generating movement in the body
Study Design and Research Methods
Motor learning
Hydration and nutrition
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1:
Paper 2:
Paper 3:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Response
36 marks this session
Practise in RevuiStudy Design and Research Methods
19 marks this session
Practise in RevuiGenerating movement in the body
16 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The May 2023 SL assessment presents a well-rounded challenge that tests both rote anatomical recall and complex data processing.
- 2Message
With a balanced mix of direct memory retrieval and multi-variable analytical tasks, students who relied purely on flashcards struggled on the high-mark application questions.
- 3Message
The difficulty index stands at a solid 3.4 out of 5, reflecting the rigorous application of command terms in Paper 2 and Paper 3.
- 4Message
Compare difficulty across recent years. Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
June 2023 2023
Sports Exercise and Health Science
The May 2023 SL assessment presents a well-rounded challenge that tests both rote anatomical recall and complex data processing. With a balanced mix of direct memory retrieval and multi-variable analytical tasks, students who relied purely on flashcards struggled on the high-mark
The May 2023 SL assessment presents a well-rounded challenge that tests both rote anatomical recall and complex data processing.
With a balanced mix of direct memory retrieval and multi-variable analytical tasks, students who relied purely on flashcards struggled on the high-mark application questions.
The difficulty index stands at a solid 3.4 out of 5, reflecting the rigorous application of command terms in Paper 2 and Paper 3.
- Total marks
- 120
- Duration
- 180 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.4 / 5
Session analysis
The May 2023 SL assessment presents a well-rounded challenge that tests both rote anatomical recall and complex data processing. With a balanced mix of direct memory retrieval and multi-variable analytical tasks, students who relied purely on flashcards struggled on the high-mark application questions. The difficulty index stands at a solid 3.4 out of 5, reflecting the rigorous application of command terms in Paper 2 and Paper 3.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1:
Paper 2:
Paper 3:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
79% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Short Answer
64·30·53%
Multiple Choice
30·30·25%
Extended Response
26·8·22%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1 (Multiple C…
0.67 m/minPaper 2 Section A (…
0.67 m/minPaper 2 Section B (…
0.67 m/minPaper 3 Option A (O…
0.67 m/minTotal marks
90
Total time
135 min
Avg pace
0.67
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Injury
85%85%
Forces, motion and movement
82%82%
Motivation
78%78%
May 2023 Sports, Exercise and Health Science SL Analysis
The May 2023 SL assessment presents a well-rounded challenge that tests both rote anatomical recall and complex data processing. With a balanced mix of direct memory retrieval and multi-variable analytical tasks, students who relied purely on flashcards struggled on the high-mark application questions. The difficulty index stands at a solid 3.4 out of 5, reflecting the rigorous application of command terms in Paper 2 and Paper 3.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h
- Total marks
- 40
- Weighting
- 20%
- Question types
- Multiple Choice
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.