Back to subject papers

9685 · Oxford AQA International A Level

9685/11

Paper 1

Psychology · 2023 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Demanding · 3.8/5

Analysis source: Oxford AQA

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.8 / 5

Total marks

360

Duration

360 min

Most tested topic

Research Methods and Experimental Design

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

360

Duration

360 min

Session difficulty

3.8 / 5

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

The January 2023 series presents a robust and well-balanced challenge across all four units.

2

It maintains a high standard of assessment, demanding rigorous evaluation (AO3) alongside precise clinical and practical applications (AO2).

3

While the multiple-choice and short-answer questions provide an accessible entry point for students, the 12-mark and 20-mark essay questions require deep conceptual command, clear structuring, and sophisticated critical thinking to reach the top level of response.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Knowledge5
RetAO24
Contextual Application3
ApAO32
Analysis & Evaluation1

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

KnowledgeKnowledgeRetAO2RetAO2Contextual ApplicationContextualApplicationApAO3ApAO3Analysis & EvaluationAnalysis &Evaluation
SkillWeightShare
  • Knowledge

    Weight: 5100%
  • RetAO2

    Weight: 480%
  • Contextual Application

    Weight: 360%
  • ApAO3

    Weight: 240%
  • Analysis & Evaluation

    Weight: 120%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Report type

Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary

Level A*

Approx. 90% of maximum mark

Level A

Approx. 80% of maximum mark

Level B

Approx. 70% of maximum mark

Level C

Approx. 60% of maximum mark

Level D

Approx. 50% of maximum mark

Level E

Approx. 40% of maximum mark

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

ExplainFrequency: 24

Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.

DescribeFrequency: 12

State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.

DiscussFrequency: 6

Present multiple perspectives with evidence; balance breadth and depth.

EvaluateFrequency: 8

Weigh arguments for and against with evidence; end with a supported judgement.

IdentifyFrequency: 10

Name or point to the specific feature asked for — avoid extra explanation.

OutlineFrequency: 6

Match the expected response style for “Outline” questions.

CalculateFrequency: 2

Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.

DrawFrequency: 1

Match the expected response style for “Draw” questions.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

No data available in official reports

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Research methods 1

30 marks this session

Research methods 2

30 marks this session

Psychopathology

30 marks this session

Cognitive development

30 marks this session

Schizophrenia

30 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2023
2024
2025
Σ

Schizophrenia

30
30
60
120

Cognitive development

30
30
30
90

Memory

30
60
90

Research methods 1

30
30
30
90

Research methods 2

30
30
30
90

Social psychology

30
30
60

Issues and debates in psychology

30
30
60

Psychopathology

30
30
60

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

2023202420252025
2023 2023 · 3.8/52024 2024 · 3.8/52025 June 2025 · 3.8/52025 Winter 2025 · 4.0/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Unit 1: Introductory Topics in Psychology (PS01): Unit 2: Biopsychology, Development and Research Methods 1 (PS02): Unit 3: Advanced Topics and Research Methods 2 (PS03): Unit 4: Approaches and Application (PS04):

90 marks90 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    The January 2023 series presents a robust and well-balanced challenge across all four units.

  • 2Message

    It maintains a high standard of assessment, demanding rigorous evaluation (AO3) alongside precise clinical and practical applications (AO2).

  • 3Message

    While the multiple-choice and short-answer questions provide an accessible entry point for students, the 12-mark and 20-mark essay questions require deep conceptual command, clear structuring, and sophisticated critical thinking to reach the top level of response.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

2023 2023

Psychology

The January 2023 series presents a robust and well-balanced challenge across all four units. It maintains a high standard of assessment, demanding rigorous evaluation (AO3) alongside precise clinical and practical applications (AO2). While the multiple-choice and short-answer que

  • The January 2023 series presents a robust and well-balanced challenge across all four units.

  • It maintains a high standard of assessment, demanding rigorous evaluation (AO3) alongside precise clinical and practical applications (AO2).

  • While the multiple-choice and short-answer questions provide an accessible entry point for students, the 12-mark and 20-mark essay questions require deep conceptual command, clear structuring, and sophisticated critical thinking to reach the top level of response.

Total marks
360
Duration
360 min
Session difficulty
3.8 / 5

Session analysis

The January 2023 series presents a robust and well-balanced challenge across all four units. It maintains a high standard of assessment, demanding rigorous evaluation (AO3) alongside precise clinical and practical applications (AO2). While the multiple-choice and short-answer questions provide an accessible entry point for students, the 12-mark and 20-mark essay questions require deep conceptual command, clear structuring, and sophisticated critical thinking to reach the top level of response.

Updated Jun 12, 2026

Paper breakdown

Unit 1: Introductory Topics in Psychology (PS01): Unit 2: Biopsychology, Development and Research Methods 1 (PS02): Unit 3: Advanced Topics and Research Methods 2 (PS03): Unit 4: Approaches and Application (PS04):

90 marks90 min

Top chapters

Research methods 130 marks
Research methods 230 marks
Psychopathology30 marks
Cognitive development30 marks
Schizophrenia30 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Memory30 marks
Social psychology30 marks
Psychopathology30 marks
Biopsychology30 marks
Cognitive development30 marks
Research methods 130 marks
Psychology of sleep30 marks
Schizophrenia30 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

64% within easy or medium reach

65
165
130
Easy: 65 marksMedium: 165 marksHard: 130 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Explain24 times
Describe12 times
Discuss6 times
Evaluate8 times
Identify10 times
Outline6 times
Calculate2 times
Draw1 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

360Marks
  • Essay Questions

    (20 Marks)

    180·9·50%

  • Short Answer

    (AO1 / AO2)

    111·39·31%

  • Extended Response

    (12 Marks)

    60·5·17%

  • Multiple Choice / Selection

    9·6·3%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Research Methods 1…Psychopathology (B…Scientific Approac…Schizophrenia (Bio…

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Multi-Store Model of Memory (MSM)

5%

5%

Vygotsky's Socio-Cultural Theory of Cognitive Development

4%

4%

Fight or Flight Response and Synaptic Transmission

4%

4%

Overall Difficulty Verdict

The January 2023 series presents a robust and well-balanced challenge across all four units. It maintains a high standard of assessment, demanding rigorous evaluation (AO3) alongside precise clinical and practical applications (AO2). While the multiple-choice and short-answer questions provide an accessible entry point for students, the 12-mark and 20-mark essay questions require deep conceptual command, clear structuring, and sophisticated critical thinking to reach the top level of response.

Examiner notes & key calculations

  • Generic Application: Examiners noted that in scenario-based questions (such as applying Ellis's ABC model to Nish's exam failure or analyzing Leo's social learning), candidates frequently write about the theory in a vacuum. You must explicitly tie the terms (e.g., Activating event, Beliefs, Consequences) directly to the specific details in the text.
  • Confusing Core Concepts: A major pitfall is confusing negative reinforcement with punishment in operant conditioning questions. Remember that negative reinforcement involves the removal of an unpleasant stimulus to strengthen a desired behaviour, while punishment aims to eliminate a behaviour.
  • Incomplete Graphing requirements: For the Unit 2 scattergram, many students lost process marks due to a lack of fully operationalised titles (which must explicitly state both co-variables, e.g., 'quality of sleep score' and 'hours of smartphone use') or by swapping the axes.

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

9685/11 — Oxford AQA International A Level Psychology (2023) | Revui