9670 · Oxford AQA International AS Level
9670/21
Paper 2
English Language · 2024 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Oxford AQA
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.5 / 5
100
240 min
Linguistic analysis of power, representations, and stylistic adaptation across varied genres and modes.
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
100
Duration
240 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
A balanced and thorough examination across Unit 1 and Unit 2, testing candidates on comparative textual analysis, directed writing, and conceptual essays on language and power.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Linguistic Terminology
Weight: 7100%Contextual &
Weight: 571%Creative
Weight: 457%Style &
Weight: 343%Theoretical
Weight: 229%Schol
Weight: 114%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level A
Approx. 80% of maximum mark
Level B
Approx. 70% of maximum mark
Level C
Approx. 60% of maximum mark
Level D
Approx. 50% of maximum mark
Level E
Approx. 40% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Match the expected response style for “Examine” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Write” questions.
Match the expected response style for “might” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
No data available in official reports
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Understanding texts (Language and context)
25 marks this session
Directed writing (Language and context)
25 marks this session
Language and social groups: texts (Language and society)
25 marks this session
Language and social groups: writing (Language and society)
25 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Understanding texts (Language and context)
Directed writing (Language and context)
Language and social groups: texts (Language and society)
Language and social groups: writing (Language and society)
Understanding texts
Directed writing
Language and social groups: texts
Language and social groups: writing
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Unit 1: Language and context: Unit 2: Language and society:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Understanding texts (Language and context)
25 marks this session
Practise in RevuiDirected writing (Language and context)
25 marks this session
Practise in RevuiLanguage and social groups: texts (Language and society)
25 marks this session
Practise in RevuiLanguage and social groups: writing (Language and society)
25 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
A balanced and thorough examination across Unit 1 and Unit 2, testing candidates on comparative textual analysis, directed writing, and conceptual essays on language and power.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2024 2024
English Language
A balanced and thorough examination across Unit 1 and Unit 2, testing candidates on comparative textual analysis, directed writing, and conceptual essays on language and power.
A balanced and thorough examination across Unit 1 and Unit 2, testing candidates on comparative textual analysis, directed writing, and conceptual essays on language and power.
- Total marks
- 100
- Duration
- 240 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.5 / 5
Session analysis
A balanced and thorough examination across Unit 1 and Unit 2, testing candidates on comparative textual analysis, directed writing, and conceptual essays on language and power.
Updated Jun 12, 2026
Paper breakdown
Unit 1: Language and context: Unit 2: Language and society:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
80% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Textual Analysis Essay
50·2·50%
Directed Writing
25·1·25%
Conceptual Essay
25·1·25%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Language and Gender / Age
85%85%
Digital & Multi-Speaker Interactions
75%75%
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.