PHYSICS-1PH0 · Pearson Edexcel GCSE (9–1)
PHYSICS-1PH0/21
(Foundation Tier)
Physics · 2022 · Variant 1
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
2.2 / 5
200
210 min
Electricity and circuits
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
200
Duration
210 min
Session difficulty
2.2 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
An exceptionally accessible pair of Foundation Tier papers (1F and 2F) characterized by high-yield mathematical substitution questions, clear graphical analysis, and structured practical-based extended writing.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Mathematical Calculation
Weight: 4100%Recall of Scientific
Weight: 375%Experimental Design
Weight: 250%Graphical Analysis
Weight: 125%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level 9
Approx. 78% of maximum mark
Level 8
Approx. 69% of maximum mark
Level 7
Approx. 61% of maximum mark
Level 6
Approx. 50% of maximum mark
Level 5
Approx. 39% of maximum mark
Level 4
Approx. 29% of maximum mark
Level 3
Approx. 23% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Give” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Draw” questions.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.1
Min per mark: 1.1
Min per mark: 1
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
Electricity and circuits
28 marks this session
Motion and forces
23 marks this session
Particle model
22 marks this session
Radioactivity
21 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
Electricity and circuits
Particle model
Motion and forces
Particle model (Paper 2)
Motion and forces (Paper 1)
Astronomy (Paper 1)
Radioactivity (Paper 1)
Conservation of energy
Difficulty trend
How session difficulty has shifted across recent years
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1F:
Paper 2F:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
Electricity and circuits
28 marks this session
Practise in RevuiMotion and forces
23 marks this session
Practise in RevuiParticle model
22 marks this session
Practise in RevuiRadioactivity
21 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
An exceptionally accessible pair of Foundation Tier papers (1F and 2F) characterized by high-yield mathematical substitution questions, clear graphical analysis, and structured practical-based extended writing.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2022 2022
Physics
An exceptionally accessible pair of Foundation Tier papers (1F and 2F) characterized by high-yield mathematical substitution questions, clear graphical analysis, and structured practical-based extended writing.
An exceptionally accessible pair of Foundation Tier papers (1F and 2F) characterized by high-yield mathematical substitution questions, clear graphical analysis, and structured practical-based extended writing.
- Total marks
- 200
- Duration
- 210 min
- Session difficulty
- 2.2 / 5
Session analysis
An exceptionally accessible pair of Foundation Tier papers (1F and 2F) characterized by high-yield mathematical substitution questions, clear graphical analysis, and structured practical-based extended writing.
Updated Jun 14, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1F:
Paper 2F:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
83% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Short Answer
140·62·70%
Extended Writing
48·8·24%
Multiple Choice
12·12·6%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Paper 1 (Q1-Q5)
0.95 m/minPaper 1 (Q6-Q10)
0.96 m/minPaper 2 (Q1-Q5)
0.95 m/minTotal marks
157
Total time
165 min
Avg pace
0.95
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Electromagnetic induction
90%90%
Waves and Seismic Waves
85%85%
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h 45min
- Total marks
- 100
- Weighting
- 50%
- Question types
- Multiple Choice, Short Answer / Labeling, Structured Calculations, Extended Writing (6-Mark)
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.