BUSINESS · Pearson Edexcel IGCSE
BUSINESS/22
Paper 2
Business · 2023 · Variant 2
Relative difficulty
Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel
Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.
3.5 / 5
160
180 min
The marketing mix (Promotion and product decisions)
Cohort performance
Session statistics from official examination reports
Total marks
160
Duration
180 min
Session difficulty
3.5 / 5
Key examiner messages
Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise
The Summer 2023 series presents a balanced but rigorous assessment of the syllabus.
While Paper 1R focuses on the operational and tactical challenges of a small floristry business in Paris, Paper 2R elevates the context to a global scale with Mahindra & Mahindra, testing multinational dynamics, corporate social responsibility, and strategic positioning.
The overall difficulty is rated as 4 stars, primarily driven by the strict application of command words and contextualization requirements.
Question difficulty map
How candidates performed on each question in this series
No data available in official reports
Assessment objectives
Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary
Skill weighting
Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.
Knowledge & Understanding
Weight: 5100%Application (AO2)
Weight: 360%Analysis (AO3)
Weight: 240%Evaluation (AO4)
Weight: 120%
Method marks watchlist
Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost
No data available in official reports
Recurring mistakes across years
Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject
No data available in official reports
Question choice intelligence
Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)
No data available in official reports
Level exemplars
What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like
No data available in official reports
Grade & admission context
How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards
Report type
Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary
Level 9
Approx. 86% of maximum mark
Level 8
Approx. 79% of maximum mark
Level 7
Approx. 73% of maximum mark
Level 6
Approx. 65% of maximum mark
Level 5
Approx. 58% of maximum mark
Level 4
Approx. 50% of maximum mark
Level 3
Approx. 43% of maximum mark
Level 2
Approx. 37% of maximum mark
Deep insights
What top candidates did
Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series
No data available in official reports
Command word playbook
How to match each command word to the expected response style
Match the expected response style for “Select” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Define” questions.
Match the expected response style for “State” questions.
Match the expected response style for “Outline” questions.
Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.
Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.
Break into parts and explain how each contributes to the whole question focus.
Support your choice with specific evidence from data or the scenario given.
Time traps
Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks
Min per mark: 1.1
Min per mark: 1.1
Min per mark: 1
Syllabus traceability
Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session
The marketing mix
28 marks this session
Motivation and rewards
19 marks this session
Cash flow forecasting
14 marks this session
Accounts analysis
12 marks this session
Financial documents
12 marks this session
MCQ trap analytics
Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary
No data available in official reports
Topic heatmap across years
Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject
Mark intensity
The marketing mix
Motivation and rewards
Market research
Internal and external communication
External factors
Accounts analysis
Quality
Paper comparison
Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session
Paper 1R: Investigating small businesses:
Paper 2R: Investigating large businesses:
Marks you can still earn
Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit
No data available in official reports
Practise what examiners flagged
Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app
The marketing mix
28 marks this session
Practise in RevuiMotivation and rewards
19 marks this session
Practise in RevuiCash flow forecasting
14 marks this session
Practise in RevuiAccounts analysis
12 marks this session
Practise in RevuiFinancial documents
12 marks this session
Practise in RevuiSelf-diagnostic checklist
Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise
- 1Message
The Summer 2023 series presents a balanced but rigorous assessment of the syllabus.
- 2Message
While Paper 1R focuses on the operational and tactical challenges of a small floristry business in Paris, Paper 2R elevates the context to a global scale with Mahindra & Mahindra, testing multinational dynamics, corporate social responsibility, and strategic positioning.
- 3Message
The overall difficulty is rated as 4 stars, primarily driven by the strict application of command words and contextualization requirements.
Teacher briefing pack
One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review
2023 2023
Business
The Summer 2023 series presents a balanced but rigorous assessment of the syllabus. While Paper 1R focuses on the operational and tactical challenges of a small floristry business in Paris, Paper 2R elevates the context to a global scale with Mahindra & Mahindra, testing multinat
The Summer 2023 series presents a balanced but rigorous assessment of the syllabus.
While Paper 1R focuses on the operational and tactical challenges of a small floristry business in Paris, Paper 2R elevates the context to a global scale with Mahindra & Mahindra, testing multinational dynamics, corporate social responsibility, and strategic positioning.
The overall difficulty is rated as 4 stars, primarily driven by the strict application of command words and contextualization requirements.
- Total marks
- 160
- Duration
- 180 min
- Session difficulty
- 3.5 / 5
Session analysis
The Summer 2023 series presents a balanced but rigorous assessment of the syllabus. While Paper 1R focuses on the operational and tactical challenges of a small floristry business in Paris, Paper 2R elevates the context to a global scale with Mahindra & Mahindra, testing multinational dynamics, corporate social responsibility, and strategic positioning. The overall difficulty is rated as 4 stars, primarily driven by the strict application of command words and contextualization requirements.
Updated Jun 13, 2026
Paper breakdown
Paper 1R: Investigating small businesses:
Paper 2R: Investigating large businesses:
Top chapters
Exam structure insights
Marks by chapter
See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.
Mark accessibility
Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.
69% within easy or medium reach
Command word frequency
Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.
Question type mix
Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.
Justify & Evaluate Essay
(9/12 marks)
60·6·38%
Short Answer
(Define/State/Outline/Explain)
40·18·25%
Analytical Essay
(6 marks)
36·6·23%
Multiple Choice
12·12·8%
Calculations
12·6·8%
Study ROI
Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.
Difficulty trend
Compare difficulty across recent years.
Time vs marks
Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.
Section A (MCQs & S
1.00 m/minSection B (Calculat
0.89 m/minSection C (Analysis
0.90 m/minTotal marks
106
Total time
115 min
Avg pace
0.92
Cumulative marks ladder
The line is your running mark total question by question; dashed lines are the estimated grade cut-offs. See which question the line crosses your target grade at, so you know how far you must answer cleanly and which questions decide a band.
Next-year prediction
Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.
Production (JIT, lean production)
85%85%
Training and Recruitment
80%80%
Break-even Analysis
75%75%
Difficulty Verdict
The Summer 2023 series presents a balanced but rigorous assessment of the syllabus. While Paper 1R focuses on the operational and tactical challenges of a small floristry business in Paris, Paper 2R elevates the context to a global scale with Mahindra & Mahindra, testing multinational dynamics, corporate social responsibility, and strategic positioning. The overall difficulty is rated as 4 stars, primarily driven by the strict application of command words and contextualization requirements.
Examiner notes & key calculations
- Generic Responses on Context Questions: In "State" and "Outline" questions, candidates frequently wrote general textbook answers. To score, answers must be explicitly applied (e.g., referencing "flowers" or "tractors").
- Repeating the Question: Starting essays by repeating the prompt word-for-word wastes valuable exam time.
- Syllabus Misconceptions: A common error identified by examiners was candidates confusing a cash flow forecast with a Statement of Comprehensive Income, leading to incorrect arguments about profitability within liquidity questions.
Exam tips
Paper format
- Duration
- 1h 30min
- Total marks
- 80
- Weighting
- 50%
- Question types
- Multiple Choice, Define, State, Calculate, Outline, Explain, Analyse, Justify, Evaluate
Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.