Back to subject papers

CHEMISTRY · Pearson Edexcel IGCSE

CHEMISTRY/11

C (Core Theory)

Chemistry · 2023 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Standard · 3.4/5

Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.4 / 5

Total marks

180

Duration

195 min

Most tested topic

Chemical calculations and stoichiometry

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

180

Duration

195 min

Session difficulty

3.4 / 5

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

A significant portion of the marks lay in quantitative analysis.

2

Stoichiometry was highly tested, particularly in multi-step moles calculations such as determining the value of x x x in hydrated sodium sulfate and the gas volume calculation at rtp for methane and hydrogen.

3

Energetics also carried high marks, with the 5-mark molar enthalpy calculation for pentanol combustion acting as a major grade differentiator.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Mathematical & Calculation7
Practical & Graphical6
Chemical Nomenclature4
Theoretical Explanation2

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

Mathematical & CalculationMathematical &CalculationPractical & GraphicalPractical &GraphicalChemical NomenclatureChemicalNomenclatureTheoretical ExplanationTheoreticalExplanation
SkillWeightShare
  • Mathematical & Calculation

    Weight: 7100%
  • Practical & Graphical

    Weight: 686%
  • Chemical Nomenclature

    Weight: 457%
  • Theoretical Explanation

    Weight: 229%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Report type

Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary

Level 9

Approx. 79% of maximum mark

Level 8

Approx. 67% of maximum mark

Level 7

Approx. 54% of maximum mark

Level 6

Approx. 47% of maximum mark

Level 5

Approx. 39% of maximum mark

Level 4

Approx. 32% of maximum mark

Level 3

Approx. 25% of maximum mark

Level 2

Approx. 18% of maximum mark

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

GiveFrequency: 28

Match the expected response style for “Give” questions.

ExplainFrequency: 13

Give reasons and link mechanism to outcome; each point needs a because/so chain.

StateFrequency: 11

Match the expected response style for “State” questions.

CalculateFrequency: 9

Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.

DescribeFrequency: 8

State features in sequence or list observable properties — do not explain causes unless asked.

DrawFrequency: 6

Match the expected response style for “Draw” questions.

NameFrequency: 5

Match the expected response style for “Name” questions.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

Paper 1C - Section …50m / 45 marks

Min per mark: 1.1

Paper 1C - Section …38m / 35 marks

Min per mark: 1.1

Paper 2C - Section …37m / 35 marks

Min per mark: 1.1

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Chemical formulae, equations and calculations

27 marks this session

Alcohols

17 marks this session

Rates of reaction

12 marks this session

Alkenes

12 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2023
2024
2025
Σ

Chemical formulae, equations and calculations

27
14
17
58

Energetics

18
19
37

Crude oil

15
14
29

Elements, compounds and mixtures

27
27

Alcohols

17
17

Reactivity series

14
14

Rates of reaction

12
12

Alkenes

12
12

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

202320242025
2023 2023 · 3.4/52024 2024 · 3.2/52025 June 2025 · 3.0/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Paper 1C:

110 marks120 min

Paper 2C:

70 marks75 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    A significant portion of the marks lay in quantitative analysis.

  • 2Message

    Stoichiometry was highly tested, particularly in multi-step moles calculations such as determining the value of x x x in hydrated sodium sulfate and the gas volume calculation at rtp for methane and hydrogen.

  • 3Message

    Energetics also carried high marks, with the 5-mark molar enthalpy calculation for pentanol combustion acting as a major grade differentiator.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

2023 2023

Chemistry

A significant portion of the marks lay in quantitative analysis. Stoichiometry was highly tested, particularly in multi-step moles calculations such as determining the value of x x x in hydrated sodium sulfate and the gas volume calculation at rtp for methane and hydrogen. Energe

  • A significant portion of the marks lay in quantitative analysis.

  • Stoichiometry was highly tested, particularly in multi-step moles calculations such as determining the value of x x x in hydrated sodium sulfate and the gas volume calculation at rtp for methane and hydrogen.

  • Energetics also carried high marks, with the 5-mark molar enthalpy calculation for pentanol combustion acting as a major grade differentiator.

Total marks
180
Duration
195 min
Session difficulty
3.4 / 5

Session analysis

A significant portion of the marks lay in quantitative analysis. Stoichiometry was highly tested, particularly in multi-step moles calculations such as determining the value of x x x in hydrated sodium sulfate and the gas volume calculation at rtp for methane and hydrogen. Energetics also carried high marks, with the 5-mark molar enthalpy calculation for pentanol combustion acting as a major grade differentiator.

Updated Jun 13, 2026

Paper breakdown

Paper 1C:

110 marks120 min

Paper 2C:

70 marks75 min

Top chapters

Chemical formulae, equations and calculations27 marks
Alcohols17 marks
Rates of reaction12 marks
Alkenes12 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Group 1 (alkali metals) – lithi4 marks
Chemical tests7 marks
Energetics11 marks
Crude oil1 marks
Covalent bonding2 marks
Gases in the atmosphere11 marks
Atomic structure5 marks
Reactivity series5 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

81% within easy or medium reach

60
85
35
Easy: 60 marksMedium: 85 marksHard: 35 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Give28 times
Explain13 times
State11 times
Calculate9 times
Describe8 times
Draw6 times
Name5 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

180Marks
  • Short Answer

    60·24·33%

  • Calculation

    40·10·22%

  • Structured Explanation

    35·8·19%

  • Practical Skills & Graphing

    25·6·14%

  • Equation & Structural Drawing

    20·12·11%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Chemical calculati…Alcohols and Ferme…Rates of Reaction …Alkenes and Additi…Gases in the Atmos…

Time vs marks

Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.

MarksMinutesMarks / min

Paper 1C - Section …

0.90 m/min
45
50

Paper 1C - Section …

0.92 m/min
35
38

Paper 2C - Section …

0.95 m/min
35
37

Total marks

115

Total time

125 min

Avg pace

0.92

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Alkanes and free-radical substitution

92%

92%

Carboxylic acids and weak acid reactions

88%

88%

Industrial metal extraction (Blast Furnace & Aluminium)

85%

85%

States of matter and heating curves

80%

80%

Examiner notes & key calculations

  • Premature Rounding: A recurrent issue across both papers was candidates rounding their intermediate mole values too early (e.g., truncating 0.00409 0.00409 0.00409 mol of pentanol to 0.004 0.004 0.004 mol), which led to incorrect final answers. Students must retain full calculator values until the final calculation step.
  • Incorrect Enthalpy Signs: In the pentanol energetics question, many students failed to include the negative sign for the exothermic reaction, despite the prompt explicitly asking to include a sign.
  • Incomplete Chemical Test Descriptions: When describing tests, candidates often wrote down only the result (e.g., "squeaky pop") instead of the full procedure and observation (e.g., "introducing a burning splint to the gas, which burns with a squeaky pop").
  • Imprecise Terminology: Students frequently confused intramolecular covalent bonds with weak intermolecular forces when explaining melting points, or referred to halogens displacing "chlorine" or "iodine" instead of "chloride" or "iodide" ions.

Exam tips

Paper format

Duration
2h
Total marks
110
Weighting
61.1%
Question types
Multiple Choice / Drag-and-Drop Equivalents, Short recall and identification, Graphing & plotting skills, Calculations & quantitative formulas, Longer explanation / structured logic

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

CHEMISTRY/11 — Pearson Edexcel IGCSE Chemistry (2023) | Revui