Back to subject papers

PURE-MATHEMATICS-YPM01 · Pearson Edexcel International A Level

PURE-MATHEMATICS-YPM01/22

Paper 2

Pure Mathematics YPM01 · Winter 2026 · Variant 2

Relative difficulty

Demanding · 3.8/5

Analysis source: Pearson Edexcel

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.8 / 5

Total marks

300

Duration

360 min

Most tested topic

Integration methods, parametric integration, and algebraic substitution

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

300

Duration

360 min

Session difficulty

3.8 / 5

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

The January 2026 Pure Mathematics examination suite (P1–P4) represents a solid Level 4 (Hard) challenge.

2

While Paper 1 and Paper 2 provided accessible entry points with standard algebraic and trigonometric tasks, Papers 3 and 4 pushed the limits of algebraic stamina, particularly through heavy integration setups, parametric calculus, and abstract proofs.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Algebraic Manipulation9
Geometric Reasoning7
Calculus & Differentiation5
Analysis Trigonometric4
Logical2
Proof1

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

Algebraic ManipulationAlgebraicManipulationGeometric ReasoningGeometricReasoningCalculus & DifferentiationCalculus &DifferentiationAnalysis TrigonometricAnalysisTrigonometricLogicalLogicalProofProof
SkillWeightShare
  • Algebraic Manipulation

    Weight: 9100%
  • Geometric Reasoning

    Weight: 778%
  • Calculus & Differentiation

    Weight: 556%
  • Analysis Trigonometric

    Weight: 444%
  • Logical

    Weight: 222%
  • Proof

    Weight: 111%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

No data available in official reports

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Report type

Examiner report — national grade boundaries and question-level commentary

Level A*

Approx. 90% of maximum mark

Level A

Approx. 80% of maximum mark

Level B

Approx. 70% of maximum mark

Level C

Approx. 60% of maximum mark

Level D

Approx. 50% of maximum mark

Level E

Approx. 40% of maximum mark

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

SolveFrequency: 14

Match the expected response style for “Solve” questions.

FindFrequency: 22

Match the expected response style for “Find” questions.

ShowFrequency: 12

Match the expected response style for “Show” questions.

SketchFrequency: 5

Match the expected response style for “Sketch” questions.

CalculateFrequency: 4

Show formula, substitution, and unit; method marks need visible working.

StateFrequency: 6

Match the expected response style for “State” questions.

ProveFrequency: 2

Match the expected response style for “Prove” questions.

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

No data available in official reports

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Integration (Unit P4: Pure Mathematics 4)

39 marks this session

Algebra and functions (Unit P1: Pure Mathematics 1)

34 marks this session

Trigonometry (Unit P3: Pure Mathematics 3)

19 marks this session

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2023
2025
2026
Σ

Integration (Unit P4: Pure Mathematics 4)

30
46
39
115

Algebra and functions (Unit P1: Pure Mathematics 1)

26
39
34
99

Trigonometry (Unit P1: Pure Mathematics 1)

20
21
41

Trigonometry (Unit P3: Pure Mathematics 3)

21
19
40

Differentiation (Unit P3: Pure Mathematics 3)

26
26

Differentiation (Unit P4: Pure Mathematics 4)

24
24

Sequences and series (Unit P2: Pure Mathematics 2)

24
24

Algebra and functions (Unit P3: Pure Mathematics 3)

19
19

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

2023202520252026
2023 Winter 2023 · 3.8/52025 November 2025 · 3.8/52025 Winter 2025 · 3.5/52026 Winter 2026 · 3.8/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Pure Mathematics P1 (WMA11/01A): Pure Mathematics P2 (WMA12/01A): Pure Mathematics P3 (WMA13/01A): Pure Mathematics P4 (WMA14/01A):

75 marks90 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    The January 2026 Pure Mathematics examination suite (P1–P4) represents a solid Level 4 (Hard) challenge.

  • 2Message

    While Paper 1 and Paper 2 provided accessible entry points with standard algebraic and trigonometric tasks, Papers 3 and 4 pushed the limits of algebraic stamina, particularly through heavy integration setups, parametric calculus, and abstract proofs.

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

Winter 2026 2026

Pure Mathematics YPM01

The January 2026 Pure Mathematics examination suite (P1–P4) represents a solid Level 4 (Hard) challenge. While Paper 1 and Paper 2 provided accessible entry points with standard algebraic and trigonometric tasks, Papers 3 and 4 pushed the limits of algebraic stamina, particularly

  • The January 2026 Pure Mathematics examination suite (P1–P4) represents a solid Level 4 (Hard) challenge.

  • While Paper 1 and Paper 2 provided accessible entry points with standard algebraic and trigonometric tasks, Papers 3 and 4 pushed the limits of algebraic stamina, particularly through heavy integration setups, parametric calculus, and abstract proofs.

Total marks
300
Duration
360 min
Session difficulty
3.8 / 5

Session analysis

The January 2026 Pure Mathematics examination suite (P1–P4) represents a solid Level 4 (Hard) challenge. While Paper 1 and Paper 2 provided accessible entry points with standard algebraic and trigonometric tasks, Papers 3 and 4 pushed the limits of algebraic stamina, particularly through heavy integration setups, parametric calculus, and abstract proofs.

Updated Jun 12, 2026

Paper breakdown

Pure Mathematics P1 (WMA11/01A): Pure Mathematics P2 (WMA12/01A): Pure Mathematics P3 (WMA13/01A): Pure Mathematics P4 (WMA14/01A):

75 marks90 min

Top chapters

Integration (Unit P4: Pure Mathematics 4)39 marks
Algebra and functions (Unit P1: Pure Mathematics 1)34 marks
Trigonometry (Unit P3: Pure Mathematics 3)19 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Algebra and functions (Unit P1:34 marks
Coordinate geometry in the (x,9 marks
Trigonometry (Unit P1: Pure Mat15 marks
Differentiation (Unit P1: Pure8 marks
Integration (Unit P1: Pure Math9 marks
Algebra and functions (Unit P2:17 marks
Coordinate geometry in the (x,11 marks
Trigonometry (Unit P2: Pure Mat9 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

73% within easy or medium reach

95
125
80
Easy: 95 marksMedium: 125 marksHard: 80 marks

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Solve14 times
Find22 times
Show12 times
Sketch5 times
Calculate4 times
State6 times
Prove2 times

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

300Marks
  • Medium Structured

    (6-9 marks)

    132·17·44%

  • Long Structured

    (10-16 marks)

    114·10·38%

  • Short Answer

    (1-5 marks)

    54·18·18%

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

DifficultyRecurrence %Algebra and functi…Integration (P4)Trigonometry (P3)Sequences and seri…

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Vector Lines Intersection and Shortest Distance

90%

90%

Logarithmic Differentiation

85%

85%

Numerical Methods (Cobweb/Staircase Diagrams)

80%

80%

Executive Difficulty Verdict

The January 2026 Pure Mathematics examination suite (P1–P4) represents a solid Level 4 (Hard) challenge. While Paper 1 and Paper 2 provided accessible entry points with standard algebraic and trigonometric tasks, Papers 3 and 4 pushed the limits of algebraic stamina, particularly through heavy integration setups, parametric calculus, and abstract proofs.

Examiner notes & key calculations

  • Non-Calculator Rigour: Examiners strictly enforced the 'no calculator technology' clause. In quadratic and cubic equations, writing down roots without showing factorisation or quadratic formula steps immediately resulted in zero marks.
  • Bracket Carelessness: In binomial expansions such as (1+kx)n (1+kx)^n (1+kx)n, candidates repeatedly wrote nkx2 n k x^2 nkx2 instead of n(n−1)2k2x2 \frac{n(n-1)}{2} k^2 x^2 2n(n−1)​k2x2, ignoring the squaring of the coefficient k k k.
  • Integration Constants: In differential equations, omitting the constant of integration +c +c +c at the point of separation blocked access to 5 out of 8 marks.

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

PURE-MATHEMATICS-YPM01/22 — Pearson Edexcel International A Level Pure Mathematics YPM01 (Winter 2026) | Revui