Back to subject papers

HUMAN-DEVELOPMENT · CSAT (대학수학능력시험)

HUMAN-DEVELOPMENT/11

Human Development

Human Development · 2021 · Variant 1

Relative difficulty

Standard · 3.0/5

Analysis source: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE)

Analysis aligned to the official syllabus and assessment design.

Relative difficulty

3.0 / 5

Total marks

50

Duration

30 min

Most tested topic

Development-stage cases, family and childcare decisions, nutrition/health data, welfare resources, and consumer-life problem solving.

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

Total marks

50

Duration

30 min

Session difficulty

3.0 / 5

Calculator policy

No calculators in any CSAT section. All arithmetic must be done by hand. English includes a listening section with broadcast audio.

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

1

KICE Human Development assesses human growth, family, childcare, health, nutrition, welfare, consumer life, clothing/housing, and life-management topics in vocational inquiry. The 2024 CSAT vocational inquiry format is 20 questions, 30 minutes, 50 points, generally for eligibl…

2

KICE designs Human Development items from the national curriculum achievement standards and publishes all questions and answers after the exam.

3

EBS-linked items about 50% means concepts, source themes, or problem types are linked, but wording and contexts are commonly transformed.

4

The official timing is 30 min for 20 questions; pacing practice should match the actual OMR marking burden.

5

KICE publishes annual test-design directions (출제 방향) emphasising syllabus-faithful items, EBS textbook linkage (~50% of Korean, Mathematics, and English items), and post-2024 exclusion of extreme “killer” items outside public-education scope.

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

Explain life-span development, family relationships, childcare, health, and welfare.
Interpret nutrition, consumer, household, clothing, housing, and care-service data.
Apply safe care, communication, human rights, and ethical decision-making.
Analyze life-management problems involving resources, relationships, and community support.
Connect individual development with family, school, workplace, and society.

Skill weighting

Cognitive skills emphasised in official test design.

Workplace Conceptual applicationWorkplaceConceptualData and case interpretationData and caseinterpretationTechnical Processing knowledgeTechnicalProcessingSafety, ethics, and communicationSafety, ethics,and
SkillWeightShare
  • Workplace Conceptual application

    Weight: 35100%
  • Data and case interpretation

    Weight: 2571%
  • Technical Processing knowledge

    Weight: 2571%
  • Safety, ethics, and communication

    Weight: 1543%

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

Life-span development: Answering from memory before checking the condition in the stem. — Underline the limiting condition and restate it…

2024 20242023 20232022 20222020 20204 sessions

Childcare and family: Treating a familiar source, graph, or scenario as identical to a past EBS example. — Compare variables and wording;…

2024 20242023 20232022 20222020 20204 sessions

Nutrition and health: Losing marks on easy items because time was spent on one high-difficulty question. — Use a two-pass strategy and ma…

2024 20242023 20232022 20222020 20204 sessions

Consumer life and welfare: Eliminating options based on a keyword match rather than the full causal relationship. — Check subject, time p…

2024 20242023 20232022 20222020 20204 sessions

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

Official body

Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE)

Grading system

KICE standard score (mean 50, SD 10; range 0–100) with percentile and Grade 1–9 bands

Scale band

Std score

Scale band

Percentile

Scale band

1

Scale band

2

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

1. Translate the workplace case

Human Development questions often wrap core concepts in workplace situations. Restate the case as process, cost, regulation, safety, or communication before answering.

2. Learn process sequences

For development, care, and household-management sequences, memorize the order of operations and decision points; sequence errors are common in vocational inquiry.

3. Read tables as evidence

In nutrition, budget, schedule, and welfare-resource tables, mark units, totals, and comparison periods before interpreting profit, yield, inventory, or quality data.

4. Keep safety and ethics visible

When care safety, privacy, rights, and ethical communication appears, choose the option that protects people, complies with rules, and preserves reliable records.

5. Practice mixed-context sets

Alternate agriculture, industry, commerce, maritime, and human-development examples so vocabulary does not hide the tested principle.

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

No data available in official reports

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

No data available in official reports

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

Life-span development, family, childcare, education, and relationships

Official topic weighting

Health, nutrition, safety, welfare, care services, and human rights

Official topic weighting

Consumer life, household management, finance, food, clothing, and housing

Official topic weighting

Communication, community resources, ethics, and life problem solving

Official topic weighting

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Σ

Life-span development, family, childcare, education, and relationships

15
15
15
15
15
75

Health, nutrition, safety, welfare, care services, and human rights

13
13
13
13
13
65

Consumer life, household management, finance, food, clothing, and housing

12
12
12
12
12
60

Communication, community resources, ethics, and life problem solving

10
10
10
10
10
50

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

20202021202220232024
2020 2020 · 3.0/52021 2021 · 3.0/52022 2022 · 3.0/52023 2023 · 3.0/52024 2024 · 3.2/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

Human Development: 20 multiple-choice vocational inquiry questions

50 marks30 min

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Message

    KICE Human Development assesses human growth, family, childcare, health, nutrition, welfare, consumer life, clothing/housing, and life-management topics in vocational inquiry. The 2024 CSAT vocational inquiry format is 20 questions, 30 minutes, 50 points, generally for eligibl…

  • 2Message

    KICE designs Human Development items from the national curriculum achievement standards and publishes all questions and answers after the exam.

  • 3Message

    EBS-linked items about 50% means concepts, source themes, or problem types are linked, but wording and contexts are commonly transformed.

  • 4Message

    The official timing is 30 min for 20 questions; pacing practice should match the actual OMR marking burden.

  • 5Message

    KICE publishes annual test-design directions (출제 방향) emphasising syllabus-faithful items, EBS textbook linkage (~50% of Korean, Mathematics, and English items), and post-2024 exclusion of extreme “killer” items outside public-education scope.

  • 6Pitfall

    Life-span development: Answering from memory before checking the condition in the stem. — Underline the limiting condition and restate it…

  • 7Pitfall

    Childcare and family: Treating a familiar source, graph, or scenario as identical to a past EBS example. — Compare variables and wording;…

  • 8Pitfall

    Nutrition and health: Losing marks on easy items because time was spent on one high-difficulty question. — Use a two-pass strategy and ma…

  • 9Pitfall

    Consumer life and welfare: Eliminating options based on a keyword match rather than the full causal relationship. — Check subject, time p…

  • 10Strength

    1. Translate the workplace case: Human Development questions often wrap core concepts in workplace situations. Restate the case as pr

  • 11Strength

    2. Learn process sequences: For development, care, and household-management sequences, memorize the order of operations and deci

  • 12Strength

    3. Read tables as evidence: In nutrition, budget, schedule, and welfare-resource tables, mark units, totals, and comparison peri

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

2021 2021

Human Development

KICE Human Development assesses human growth, family, childcare, health, nutrition, welfare, consumer life, clothing/housing, and life-management topics in vocational inquiry. The 2024 CSAT vocational inquiry format is 20 questions, 30 minutes, 50 points, generally for eligible v

  • KICE Human Development assesses human growth, family, childcare, health, nutrition, welfare, consumer life, clothing/housing, and life-management topics in vocational inquiry. The 2024 CSAT vocational inquiry format is 20 questions, 30 minutes, 50 points, generally for eligibl…

  • KICE designs Human Development items from the national curriculum achievement standards and publishes all questions and answers after the exam.

  • EBS-linked items about 50% means concepts, source themes, or problem types are linked, but wording and contexts are commonly transformed.

  • Life-span development: Answering from memory before checking the condition in the stem. — Underline the limiting condition and restate it…

  • Childcare and family: Treating a familiar source, graph, or scenario as identical to a past EBS example. — Compare variables and wording;…

Total marks
50
Duration
30 min
Session difficulty
3.0 / 5
Calculator policy
No calculators in any CSAT section. All arithmetic must be done by hand. English includes a listening section with broadcast audio.

Session analysis

KICE Human Development assesses human growth, family, childcare, health, nutrition, welfare, consumer life, clothing/housing, and life-management topics in vocational inquiry. The 2024 CSAT vocational inquiry format is 20 questions, 30 minutes, 50 points, generally for eligible vocational high-school candidates, with EBS linkage around 50%. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (KICE) emphasises development-stage cases, family and childcare decisions, nutrition/health data, welfare resources, and consumer-life problem solving.. Priority revision: Life-span development, family, childcare, education, and relationships, Health, nutrition, safety, welfare, care services, and human rights, Consumer life, household management, finance, food, clothing, and housing, Communication, community resources, ethics, and life problem solving. Human Development questions often wrap core concepts in workplace situations. Restate the case as process, cost, regulation, safety, or communication before answering.

Updated 2026-07-03

Paper breakdown

Human Development: 20 multiple-choice vocational inquiry questions

50 marks30 min

Top chapters

Life-span development, family, childcare, education, and relationships15 marks
Health, nutrition, safety, welfare, care services, and human rights13 marks
Consumer life, household management, finance, food, clothing, and housing12 marks
Communication, community resources, ethics, and life problem solving10 marks

Exam structure insights

Marks by syllabus topic

Revision priority from official test-design weighting.

Life-span development, family, child15 marks
Health, nutrition, safety, welfare, 13 marks
Consumer life, household management,12 marks
Communication, community resources, 10 marks

Mark accessibility

Estimated difficulty spread based on official design.

Development-stage cases, family and childcare decisions, nutrition/health data,

26
47
27
Easy: 26 marksMedium: 47 marksHard: 27 marks

Paper structure

Official paper breakdown for this subject.

50Marks
  • Human Development

    50·10·100%

Official syllabus scope

KICE Human Development assesses human growth, family, childcare, health, nutrition, welfare, consumer life, clothing/housing, and life-management topics in vocational inquiry. The 2024 CSAT vocational inquiry format is 20 questions, 30 minutes, 50 points, generally for eligible vocational high-school candidates, with EBS linkage around 50%.

Difficulty verdict

Rated 3/5 for November sessions. Development-stage cases, family and childcare decisions, nutrition/health data, welfare resources, and consumer-life problem solving.

What examiners measure

1. Explain life-span development, family relationships, childcare, health, and welfare. 2. Interpret nutrition, consumer, household, clothing, housing, and care-service data. 3. Apply safe care, communication, human rights, and ethical decision-making. 4. Analyze life-management problems involving resources, relationships, and community support. 5. Connect individual development with family, school, workplace, and society.

Where the marks are

Highest-weight syllabus areas: Life-span development, family, childcare, education, and relationships; Health, nutrition, safety, welfare, care services, and human rights; Consumer life, household management, finance, food, clothing, and housing; Communication, community resources, ethics, and life problem solving.

Examiner notes & key calculations

  • KICE designs Human Development items from the national curriculum achievement standards and publishes all questions and answers after the exam.
  • EBS-linked items about 50% means concepts, source themes, or problem types are linked, but wording and contexts are commonly transformed.
  • The official timing is 30 min for 20 questions; pacing practice should match the actual OMR marking burden.
  • Distractors usually represent common misconceptions, not random wrong answers, so elimination must be evidence-based.
  • High-discrimination items often combine two syllabus domains or require interpreting a new source, graph, table, or scenario.
  • A full mock should include answer-sheet transfer and a post-test error log organized by domain and mistake type.
  • Human Development turns curriculum knowledge into workplace scenarios, so students must read roles, constraints, and data carefully.
  • Vocational inquiry rewards correct process order and safe professional judgment as much as term recognition.
  • Paper 1: Human Development · 50 marks · 30 min · 20 multiple-choice vocational inquiry questions.

Exam tips

Paper format

Duration
30 min
Total marks
50
Weighting
100%
Question types
20 multiple-choice vocational inquiry questions
  • Human Development questions often wrap core concepts in workplace situations. Restate the case as process, cost, regulation, safety, or communication before answering.
  • For development, care, and household-management sequences, memorize the order of operations and decision points; sequence errors are common in vocational inquiry.
  • In nutrition, budget, schedule, and welfare-resource tables, mark units, totals, and comparison periods before interpreting profit, yield, inventory, or quality data.

Common mistakes

  • Life-span development

    Answering from memory before checking the condition in the stem.

    How to avoid: Underline the limiting condition and restate it in your own words before selecting an option.

  • Childcare and family

    Treating a familiar source, graph, or scenario as identical to a past EBS example.

    How to avoid: Compare variables and wording; transformed linkage often changes the required inference.

  • Nutrition and health

    Losing marks on easy items because time was spent on one high-difficulty question.

    How to avoid: Use a two-pass strategy and mark unresolved items after 60-75 seconds.

Analysis is paraphrased for study purposes. Always verify against the official examiner report and mark scheme.

HUMAN-DEVELOPMENT/11 — CSAT (대학수학능력시험) Human Development (2021) | Revui