All exam insights

TPAT-1-MEDICAL-APTIT · 2024

TPAT 1 - Medical Aptitude

Official TCAS Thailand examination materials and examiner commentary for TPAT 1 - Medical Aptitude (2024). Refer to the board portal for the latest published reports.

Last reviewed: 2026-06-30Paraphrased for study purposes — not an official publication of the exam board.

Cohort performance

Session statistics from official examination reports

No data available in official reports

Key examiner messages

Top priorities from the principal examiner before you revise

No data available in official reports

Question difficulty map

How candidates performed on each question in this series

No data available in official reports

Assessment objectives

Skill and AO weighting from official examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Method marks watchlist

Where working, steps, or method marks were commonly lost

No data available in official reports

Recurring mistakes across years

Themes examiners flag in multiple recent sessions for this subject

Ethics: Choosing the option that benefits the most visible person while ignoring patient autonomy or confidentiality. — Check every answe…

2023 20232022 20222021 20212020 20204 sessions

Evidence: Using outside medical assumptions not stated in the passage. — Treat passage facts as the controlling evidence.

2023 20232022 20222021 20212020 20204 sessions

Pacing: Over-investing in Part 1 and rushing ethics or reading scenarios. — Set section time checkpoints before the exam starts.

2023 20232022 20222021 20212020 20204 sessions

Data interpretation: Comparing raw totals when rates or percentages are required. — Identify denominator and unit before ranking outcomes.

2023 20232022 20222021 20212020 20204 sessions

Professional judgement: Selecting a heroic individual response instead of using a safe team or referral process. — Prefer appropriate esc…

2023 20232022 20222021 20212020 20204 sessions

Question choice intelligence

Mean scores and popularity for optional questions (HKDSE electives)

No data available in official reports

Level exemplars

What candidate scripts at each grade level looked like

No data available in official reports

Grade & admission context

How marks relate to grade thresholds and entry standards

No data available in official reports

Deep insights

What top candidates did

Techniques and approaches examiners rewarded in this series

No data available in official reports

Command word playbook

How to match each command word to the expected response style

No data available in official reports

Time traps

Sections where candidates spent disproportionate time relative to marks

No data available in official reports

Syllabus traceability

Topics linked to questions and mark weighting in this session

No data available in official reports

MCQ trap analytics

Commonly chosen wrong options from examiner commentary

No data available in official reports

Topic heatmap across years

Mark concentration by topic and exam year for this subject

Mark intensity

LowHigh
Topic
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Σ

Part 1: Aptitude and reasoning

100
100
100
100
100
500

Part 2: Ethics and professional judgement

100
100
100
100
100
500

Part 3: Reading and connected reasoning

100
100
100
100
100
500

Difficulty trend

How session difficulty has shifted across recent years

20202021202220232024
2020 2020 · 5.0/52021 2021 · 5.0/52022 2022 · 5.0/52023 2023 · 5.0/52024 2024 · 5.2/5

Paper comparison

Marks and duration breakdown across papers in this session

No data available in official reports

Marks you can still earn

Where valid approaches outside the mark scheme may still gain credit

No data available in official reports

Practise what examiners flagged

Target weak topics from this report inside the Revui app

No data available in official reports

Self-diagnostic checklist

Key actions before you sit this paper — copy and tick off as you revise

  • 1Pitfall

    Ethics: Choosing the option that benefits the most visible person while ignoring patient autonomy or confidentiality. — Check every answe…

  • 2Pitfall

    Evidence: Using outside medical assumptions not stated in the passage. — Treat passage facts as the controlling evidence.

  • 3Pitfall

    Pacing: Over-investing in Part 1 and rushing ethics or reading scenarios. — Set section time checkpoints before the exam starts.

  • 4Pitfall

    Data interpretation: Comparing raw totals when rates or percentages are required. — Identify denominator and unit before ranking outcomes.

  • 5Pitfall

    Professional judgement: Selecting a heroic individual response instead of using a safe team or referral process. — Prefer appropriate esc…

Teacher briefing pack

One-page session summary for tutors and classroom review

2024 2024

TPAT 1 - Medical Aptitude

Official TCAS Thailand examination materials and examiner commentary for TPAT 1 - Medical Aptitude (2024). Refer to the board portal for the latest published reports.

  • Ethics: Choosing the option that benefits the most visible person while ignoring patient autonomy or confidentiality. — Check every answe…

  • Evidence: Using outside medical assumptions not stated in the passage. — Treat passage facts as the controlling evidence.

Revui has indexed this report from the official exam board. Open the original examiner report for full comments on candidates' performance. Curated charts and pitfalls for this series are coming soon.

View official report